Now is the time to “actively and enthusiastically seek, teach and live by truth,” Elder D. Todd Christofferson of the Quorum of the Twelve Apostles taught concurrently a devotional grasped in the Salt Lake Tabernacle on Jan. 26.
“It has consistently been important not only to teach but to defend truth, and in our time that require seems to be growing,” he said.
In an address to Church Educational System educators for the annual “Evening with a General Authority” event, Elder Christofferson communicated of truth and the require for Church educators to help their students find truth with divine assistance.
“The first thing we should grasp about truth, then, is that a knowledge of truth in any significant measure requires divine assistance, either over the Light of Christ or by the aid of the Holy Ghost,” he said. “Given our limited mortal capacity and resources, if we are unaided by revelation, we simply cannot achieve a comprehensive knowledge of stuff as they were, are and will be, and how any one thing relates to how anything else was, is, or will be.”
Although every individual is required to study and learn, it is over that “divine help” that a individual is able to find understanding.
“We, of all people, should be humble and realistic enough to acknowledge that not only does salvation come by grace ‘after all we can do,’ but our grasp of truth similarly comes by grace ‘after all we can do,’” he said.
Truth, Elder Christofferson taught, is “a fixed reality,” that governs the present sphere, exists independent and apart, and is unaffected by preference or opinion and stands independent of any attempt to control or change it.
“It cannot be lobbied or influenced in any way,” he said.
But in much of the world, relativist thinking has become a dominant philosophy.
“By relativism I mean the view that ethical or moral truths are relative, that they depend on the attitudes and feelings of those who hold them, and that no one can judge the validity of someone else’s ‘truth,’” he said. “You hear a lot of talk these days about ‘my truth’ and ‘his truth’ or ‘her truth.’”
The philosophy of moral relativism, where “not judging” has become an almost unchallengeable standard for conversation and behavior, has become popular.
“But in reality, we all make judgments about what is right and wrong, and not merely for ourselves, but for the people and society around us,” he said. “Laws and systems of law, even political systems, are the embodiment of moral values and perceived truths.”
Recognizing that in a pluralistic society, people may debate what values should be enshrined in laws or regulations and what is right, wrong or true, Elder Christofferson stated “in the end, on any provided issue, someone’s view, or a few group’s view of truth, prevails and everyone becomes bound by it.”
But moral relativism doesn’t work if there is to be demand and judge in society, the head taught.
“Can murder be wrong for best but right for some?” he asked. “Is a thief entitled to keep what he steals and continue stealing because he believes robbery is right for him, especially after he grew up in underprivileged circumstances? Or, taking note of something true much in the news today, is a man entitled to sexually harass a woman because he finds it fulfilling and consistent with his personal sense of right and wrong?”
Recognizing there are a few stuff that are generally accepted as wrong and have laws from them — murder, rape, theft and other actions that injure people or interfere with their legitimate pursuit of happiness — Elder Christofferson stated it is beyond those “acknowledged human rights” that moral relativism applies, where a individual may define for himself or herself what is right or wrong.
“But this mark of reasoning makes the point that there are in fact moral absolutes, whether you call them universal human rights or something else,” he said. “The only debate, really, is what they are and how far they extend. What we refer to as moral relativism is actually an ongoing debate about tolerance: What actions and differences should be tolerated in society and in human relations?”
Because of this climate, Elder Christofferson signified to educators their “calling” is to teach the truth of moral concepts — what they are and how far they extend.
“We prize truth on any subject from any source, but eternal truth, especially as it bears on the meaning and purpose of conduct in life, we should obtain from God,” he said.
Drawing from a recent Pew Research Center study that reported that for the first time, a majority of Americans — 56 percent — assert a religious belief is not necessary to be a fantastic person, Elder Christofferson stated that although a individual does not have to profess a belief in God to be a fantastic person, goodness derives from God.
“I’m sure we would agree that people who are atheists or who otherwise have not professed religion or religious belief can be, and best often are, fantastic and upright people,” he said. “But we would not agree that this happens without God. … Whether someone enjoys it or not, believes it or not, or is even aware of it or not, he or she is imbued with the Light of Christ and therefore possesses a common sense of right and wrong that we sometimes call conscience.”
Without law, there would be no “upside to our existence,” he said.
It is over the doctrine or gospel of Christ — faith in Christ, repentance and baptism, both of water and of the Spirit — that a individual is able to choose righteousness and happiness.
“There are honestly only two options,” he taught. “One is to pursue truth by heeding the words of Christ. … The other is to be taken in by the adversary and try the impossible — to find happiness in his fictions. One cannot succeed in life in this place or hereafter by ignoring the truth of truth, but some, actually a lot of people, attempt it — it merely looks so much easier than repenting. But only repentance and obedience to the truth of God free us from a fantasy world that is destined to fail.”