A new National Bureau of Economic Research study by Janna Johnson and Morris Kleiner study finds that authority licensing laws massively inhibit geographic mobility (here is an prior ungated version).
Occupational licensure, one of the best significant labor market regulations in the United States, may restrict the interstate movement of workers. We analyze the interstate migration of 22 licensed occupations. Using an empirical strategy that controls for unobservable characteristics that drive long-distance moves, we find that the between-state migration rate for individuals in occupations with state-specific licensing exam requirements is 36 percent lower relative to members of other occupations. Members of licensed occupations with nationwide licensing exams show no evidence of limited interstate migration. The size of this effect varies over occupations and appears to be tied to the authority specificity of licensing requirements. We further bring evidence that the adoption of reciprocity agreements, that lower re-licensure costs, increases the interstate migration rate of lawyers. Based on our results, we estimate that the rise in occupational licensing can explain part of the documented decline in interstate migration and job transitions in the United States.
The new study adds to the already substantial evidence indicating that licensing laws are a major obstacle to geographic mobility, specifically for poor and lower-middle class people seeking to move to areas with greater opportunity. We have learnt to the point where some 30 percent of Americans have to have licenses to legally work in their respective fields, including even a few states that license florists and tour guides. The evidence further suggests that most of these laws do far more to suppress competition than protect consumers.
Like the closely related case of zoning restrictions on housing construction, licensing laws are a form of authority intervention that harms the general public and the poor, although benefiting politically connected insiders. Both further greatly inhibit mobility and make it true difficult for people in economically depressed regions to move to areas with greater opportunity. Yet an additional similarity between zoning and licensing is that both have been severely criticized by policy experts over the political spectrum.
Sadly, thanks in part to widespread political ignorance, voters and politicians have largely turned a blind eye to both issues. Hopefully, that will begin to change.