A Negotiated Settlement in Afghanistan Is Ideal, Yet Remains Distant



The Afghan authority declared recently that it wants to close the Taliban’s office in Doha, Qatar.

The Taliban representative’s presence in Doha dates to 2011, with the formal office being established in 2013. The office was originally established to give the Taliban a permanent location in a neutral country where Afghan authority officials and the Islamic militants can engage in peace talks.

The ultimate goal was to negotiate a settlement regarding the ongoing conflict in Afghanistan.

But to date, Taliban representatives have made no fantastic faith efforts to meet with Afghan authority officials.

It’s no surprise that Hanif Atmar, the nationwide security adviser to Afghan President Ashraf Ghani, has expressed his desire to have the Qatar authority close the Taliban office, as it has been of no benefit to the Afghan government.

The main problem is that the Taliban has refused to meet directly with the Afghan government, labeling it a puppet of the United States. Instead, the Taliban says it will only speak to the U.S. government.

The United States, meanwhile, insists that the Taliban should talk directly to the Afghan government. If there is to be a negotiated peace for the Afghan people, the Taliban should overcome its enmity approaching the Afghan authority and engage in a peace process with Kabul.

In terms of achieving a negotiated settlement, the Taliban is the main problem.

The authority of Afghanistan has done a lot to find a way to bring the Taliban to the negotiating table. Ghani even recently offered to recognize the Taliban as a legitimate political entity, in exchange for the Taliban’s recognition of the Afghan authority and respect for the rule of law, including the rights of women.

This recognition would further mean that the Taliban can open an office in Kabul, or an additional location, that can be used for further negotiations. To date, however, the Taliban’s response to the proposal has been negative.

The U.S. is further becoming frustrated with the lack of progress approaching a negotiated settlement. Last year, the Trump administration originally called for Afghanistan to negotiate political settlement with the Taliban, but changed its tone after a series of attacks that took place in Kabul targeting civilians.

It remains to be seen if this change in tone from Washington about a negotiated settlement was an actual change in U.S. policy.


Recently, a four-nation attempt of the United States, Afghanistan, Saudi Arabia, and the United Arab Emirates—spearheaded by the United Nations Security Council—has been formed with the hope of finally bringing the Taliban to the negotiating table.

It is hoped that the involvement of Saudi Arabia—a religious head in the Muslim world—would help.

The U.S. military has made substantial progress in the war in Afghanistan over the years, from the elimination of Taliban leaders to the successful U.S. counterinsurgency operations. However, the United States needs to continue to work to strengthen the Afghan government’s competency and press it to root out corruption.

If the war is to completion in Afghanistan, it will only be over a political settlement. In the meantime, the United States and the Afghan governments should negotiate a settlement with the Taliban from a position of strength. That’s why it was so important that President Donald Trump remained committed to the lobby last year.

Thank you for reading: A Negotiated Settlement in Afghanistan Is Ideal, Yet Remains Distant appeared first on The Daily Signal.


News Puddle Author

New Puddle broadcasts the latest news from around the world. Covering all subjects, we bring news when it's available to ensure you are consistently well-informed.

Leave a Reply